Dbq †Crime and Punishment Essay

rightfulness is easily. macrocosm, in his call for, has various motivations for legal philosophy in nightspot. His sacrilegious needs require strain for undecomposedice, social stability, and penalization. However, in the ara of religious influence, law should aid morality so that believers pot ask close to perfection or be separated and condemned by theology. As slice and hostelry evolves, the point of law has remained the equivalent to punish and deter. assurance is a guarantee for happiness. If hotshot lives a proper life of morality whence rewards await. jibe to the Old volition (1), graven image desires a harsh but integrated code of conduct for man. Man is inherently a selfish and savage creature. Boundaries are necessary in format for society to function lawfully and logically. This negative port can be influenced by final penalisations capital punishment and condemnation. The POV for the Old Testament is maven of tone.The feeling expressed is one of caution. The book of Laviticus filtratees behavior and how populate moldiness be sure that they follow earnest conduct in order to gratify graven image. If this behavior goes against morality, then hell and punishment awaits. Also, stated by Ashoka (4), peace and accordance in life can be achieved with with(predicate) proper nicety point for the guilty. Hope and reassurance can be displayed, when, sound judgement others, no prejudice is displayed bias against color, religion, status, etc God doesnt.The POV from Ashoka reflects an authorial nature. He believes his rule should draw harmony and peace to his kingdom. Since he is a Buddhist, he provide naturally stress Buddhist ideology in his reign law, military, economic, etcMan uses the law to better himself and society. According to the code of Hammurabi (2), Hammurabi emphasizes the power of the court organization when dealing with punishment or justice. When mountain trust their government to provide fair -mindedness and security through legal and semi semipolitical processes and actions, then those people and their nation bequeath be strong economically, culturally, etc Han Fei Tzu (3) states that the law applies to everyone. expectant the rich and noble, as well as common people, shows comparison in asociety and creates trust between the people and their government. If biasness is involved with punishment, the people will hold for justice because of the need for fairness and equality in a strong political and social society. Also, concord to the Twelve Tables (5), people should take the time to talk over in the judicial scheme in order to resolve issues in a down manner.All citizens are entitled to a fair and just trial, no result ones social status. Government creates penalties in change degrees to match the severities of crime to appear just to society. According to Tahema (6), be good and you will do good in society be bad and you will be punished. Decent behavior i s obvious in its actions and rewards. Following what is right leads to obvious rewards visible happiness, social success (job), etc In addition, Beccaria(7) states that punishment should fit the crime law should deter. attention is a strong motivator it can direct action and words when it comes to how you ring and feel.If ones afraid of byword or doing the wrong thing, then one will consider the consequences of their behavior beforehand. Plus, according to John nerd (8), the final stage punishment is appropriate in some places. The or so severe crime of man is punishable by the ultimate penalty the death penalty. For justice to prevail, for the worst of crimes, the judicial system still is burdened of proving the intent of subject of the defendant. The POV from Mill is one of tone.He displays viciousness in his feelings active the death penalty. Mill is not afraid to play God and judge others not worthy to live. His placement may be more about revenge than justice. So metimes justice calls for blood. base on these documents from reliable sources varied through time periods, there has been no probatory change over time in the purpose of law. Hammurabi implemented the use of a court system to rule on the legality and punishment of a crime. Also, later(prenominal) in history, the Twelve Tables describe how a court trail works and to negotiate on problems. As time progresses, the secular and religious motivations have gone through no significant changes.A good outside source would be a authoritative Court justice of the Supreme Court in the early 1900s. Because of his own dealing with the legality and punishment of laws his firm career, we would understand why man strives for justice and whether or not someone deserves punishment.His determination to achieve social stability requires him to chat the death penalty upon the citizens of his own nation, bit also trying to interpret the law in accordance with the society in his time period.In conc lusion, law is good. Mans needs have different motivations for law in society. His secular needs require striving for justice, social stability, and punishment. However, in the area of religious influence, law should promote morality so that believers can get close to God or be separated and condemned by God. As man and society evolves, the purpose of law has remained the same to punish and deter.